Commonwealth v. Pristas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaulding, J.,
Appellant James Pristas was convicted as an accessory before and after the fact of malicious mischief by explosive and of conspiracy to do an unlawful act. The convictions resulted from a jury trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on January 29-30, 1969. This appeal is from the dismissal of appellant’s petition by Judge Ralph H. Smith, Jr., the trial judge, under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25,1966, P. L. 1580 (1965), 19 P.S. §1180.
Appellant contends that he was sentenced twice on the convictions and that the second sentence imposed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Woods v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PfeifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.