Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Adams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM BENTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Benton County.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

The mule of Adams was stolen, and by the thief sold to McDaniel Bros., who in turn sold it to a stranger. The purchase and sale by McDaniel was in ignorance of the theft.

*757Adams sues McDaniel Bros, in trover for tire conversion of the mule, after having made demand for the mule or its proceeds.

There was verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

Defendants have appealed in error, assigning two grounds of error.

First. That no judgment could be entered on the verdict because the record shows only ten jurors composed the jury. There is nothing in this assignment. There is nothing in the record on the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Brake Systems, Inc. v. American Environmental Protection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. Duncan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. First Nat. Bank v. BarbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Cowan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. Creach v. Ralph Nichols Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API