Legal Opinion

McDonald v. McConkey

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,631PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from the Third District Court, County of Alameda. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Thornton, J.:

In this cause, the respondent, by his attorney, J. R. Palmer, Esq., moves to dismiss the appeal and strike the transcript from the files, on the grounds that the attorney (A. H. Griffith) who signed, filed, and served the notice of appeal, and filed and served the transcript herein, was not, at the time of so doing, the attorney of record for the defendant and appellant, and was not, therefore, competent to give such notice or take an appeal in the cause.

There appears in the transcript, at the end thereof, a certificate, signed by A. H. Griffith, as attorney…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. GoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Buell v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API