Legal Opinion

State v. . Ammons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRkson, J.

The defendants, in the court below, made motions to dismiss the action or for judgment as of nonsuit, at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. C. S., 4643. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

“On motion to dismiss or judgment of nonsuit, the evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to the State, and it is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. 'An exception to a motion to dismiss in a criminal action taken after the close of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. . BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. . IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . CarlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API