Kirkendall v. Heckinger
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question before us is whether in an action brought by plaintiffs for equitable relief, § 16 of the residential builders licensing act 1 precludes defendants from obtaining relief in the form of reasonable expenditures for improvement made with the consent of the plaintiffs while defendants had title to the property.
Frank Kirkendall purchased a lot in Lenawee County in August 1973 and planned to build a home on the land for his son Dennis. Kirkendall owed $1250 on the land at the time he approached defendant Carl Heckinger to construct a house. Heckinger agreed to pay off the land contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Bonninghausen v. HansenMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Charles Featherly Construction Co. v. Property Development Group, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Mintz v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stokes v. Millen Roofing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Republic Bank v. Modular One LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barbour v. Handlos Real Estate & Building Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- HA Smith Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DecinaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kirkendall v. HeckingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.