Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-355PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

In this appeal, Hill advances fifteen propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm the sentence of death.

Inaccurate Jury Sentencing Standard (I-IV)

In propositions of law Nos. I through IV, Hill raises issues centered around his claim that the jury was fundamentally misled concerning the sentencing standard by which aggravating circumstances are weighed against…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API