Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Fox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1961No. 38735PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

In this action defendant in error, Mrs. Pearl Fox, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”, seeks to recover damages from plaintiffs in error, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., hereafter referred to as “Frisco”, F. H. Atkins, Leo V. Rheuark and J. N. Berry, who were defendants below, for personal injuries sustained as a result of one of Frisco’s trains striking an automobile operated by plaintiff. The individual defendants above named were engineer, fireman, and conductor, respectively, of the train. The accident occurred at a point where Frisco’s railway tracks intersect…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Gallaspy v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wayne Whiteley, Individually, and Wayne Whiteley, D/B/A Whiteley L.P. Gas v. Okc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Fleming v. Baptist General ConventionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. HawesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API