Legal Opinion

Sutter Corp. v. Tri-Boro Municipal Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1985No. 02015 Philadelphia, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This case comes to us on appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Susquehanna County and involves plaintiff-appellant’s appeal from a decision of the court below which found in favor of the defendant-appellee and held that it was entitled to retain the sum of $59,300 in liquidated damages on its contract with plaintiff. Defendant had filed an Answer and Counterclaim to plaintiff’s Complaint. The total contract price was $829,071.89.

Plaintiff, a contractor, and defendant, a municipal authority, entered into a written, public construction contract for the construction of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Bobali Corp. v. Tamapa Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Mammarella v. RugeriisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. G. Cullen Construction, Inc. v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Meyer-Chatfield v. Century Business Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Wayne Knorr, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. Interstate Contractors Supply Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. A. G. Cullen Construction, Inc. v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API