Legal Opinion

Mammarella v. Rugeriis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1930No. Appeal 210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keeeer, J.,

This was an action of assumpsit to recover a balance due the plaintiff under a written contract for the erection of a building. The contract price was $4,750, of which $4,250 was paid, leaving a balance of $500, which was demanded in this suit. The defendant admitted payment of only $4,250, but set up by way of counterclaim two items of damages: (1) Resulting from defective work, $139.50; (2) liquidated damages for delay in completing the building, as per contract, 66 days at $15 per day, $990. Plaintiff was permitted tó amend his statement by an averment that the delay…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sutter Corp. v. Tri-Boro Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API