Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Utah Power & Light Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1945No. 3140PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, District Judge.
The appeal in this case is from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The motions for summary judgment, supported by affidavits, were directed against plaintiffs’ Amended and Supplemental Complaint filed on October 18, 1944.
Plaintiffs in their Amended and Supplemental Complaint sought to accomplish two things: First, the cancellation of a contract of sale entered into on April 20, 1944, between two defendants, Utah Light and Traction Company, hereinafter referred to as Traction Company, and Salt Lake City Lines, hereinafter referred to as City Lines; second, an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- American Ins. Co. v. Gentile Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Sms Manufacturing Company, Inc., a Corporation and Manly M. Moore, Individually v. U. S.-Mengel Plywoods, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Stuart Inv. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.