Legal Opinion
Burnham v. Bartley (In Re Specialty Tape Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 1991No. 19-20660PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that defendants Bartley and Burgy, both of whom had been officers and directors of Specialty Tape Corporation (hereinafter “debtor”), surreptitiously and unlawfully transferred debtor’s assets to Steel City Tape Corporation (hereinafter “Steel City”), of which they also were officers and directors. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages and replevin of a tape slitter.
Defendants deny that their actions were unlawful and argue that neither monetary damages nor replevin of the tape slitter is appropriate.
As it is clear to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bailey v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- International Electronics Co. v. N. S. T. Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Lerch EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- CST, INC. v. MarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fitzpatrick v. ShaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of Harris v. Dawley (In Re Dawley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re Total Containment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Miller v. Parker (In Re Reading Broadcasting, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re Jamuna Real Estate, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.