Legal Opinion

Inman v. Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 29, 1996No. Civil Action 93-40523PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GADOLA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Thomas and Linda Inman filed this, products liability action seeking damages for injuries Thomas Inman sustained while operating a printing press. Before the court are motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG, Heidelberg Eastern, Inc., EAC USA, Inc. and Heidelberg USA, Inc. a/k/a Standby USA. 1

I. Facts

Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG is a manufacturer of printing presses in Heidelberg, Germany. In 1972, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG sold the Heidelberg SORDZ 36", the press which is the subject…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Mills v. Curioni, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Paul v. Henri-Liné Machine Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  4. King-Washington v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API