Legal Opinion

Polak v. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1416 (RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff, renowned economist Dr. Jacques Polak, commenced the instant action against the defendant, the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), alleging negligence and negligence per se in the construction and maintenance of stairs on the IMF’s premises. The defendant moves…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eugene Nyambal v. International Monetary FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. Price v. UNISEA, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Kaiser Group International, Inc v. World BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Kling v. The World Health OrganizationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API