Legal Opinion

Lee v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1940No. 34791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted this suit to have annulled and set aside, on the ground of lack of consideration, a certain oil and gas lease and a deed of two-thirds of the minerals affecting eighty acres of land located near what is known as the Cotton Valley Oil Field in Webster Parish, Louisiana, executed by Willie Jordan as their (plaintiffs’) agent and attorney in fact in favor of James E.' Perkins.

Defendant excepted to plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that B. S. SoRelle, who had acquired the léase from him (defendant) prior to the institution of this suit, was a necessary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Daquin v. CoironSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  4. Hickman v. DawsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  5. Muse v. YarbóroughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Cheramie v. StilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Loew's, Inc. v. Don George, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Hartsfield v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. State ex rel. Bordelon v. JusticeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API