Legal Opinion

MacKubin v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1948No. [No. 93, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

Mrs. Maud P. Mackubin, appellant, a stockholder in Curtiss-Wright Corporation, a manufacturer of aeronautical equipment, claims that she is a third-party beneficiary under a stock listing agreement made by that corporation with the New York Stock Exchange, and that she is consequently entitled to recover certain loss which she alleges she sustained as a result of a breach of the agreement.

It appears from the record that on June 1, 1982, Curtiss Wright Corporation, which is incorporated under the laws of Delaware, filed an application to list its $2 noncumulative Class A ($1 par) stock on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Shillman v. HobstetterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Copiers Typewriters Calculators, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  4. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API