Legal Opinion

City of Honolulu v. Ward

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1929No. 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, X

This is a condemnation proceeding brought by the City and County of Honolulu for the purpose of acquiring for use as a public highway two certain parcels of land, designated as Lots 19 and 21, owned by Mrs. Victoria Ward, each of which parcels constitutes only a part of a larger tract of land, which latter is not sought to be condemned.

The jury before which the case was tried returned a verdict assessing the damages and allowing the compensation to which it believed from the evidence the defendant was entitled. Judgment of condemnation was thereupon entered and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Patton v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Mead v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ake v. BloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ward v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. DecorionHawaii Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API