United States v. Ervin
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused pleaded guilty before a special court-martial to a number of offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. After various modifications, the sentence included confinement at hard labor for four months and a bad-conduct discharge, which was suspended with provision for automatic remission.
Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is to the effect that the instructions in regard to the sentence were erroneous. The contention is meritorious. See United States v Mamaluy, 10 USCMA 102, 27 CMR 176 (1959); United States v…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. SpellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. ParishUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. MasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. MohrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. MilanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.