Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Interpretation of S.D. Const. Art. V, §§ 2 and 6

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2011No. 26089Published

1Opinion of the Court

#26089

2011 S.D. 44

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * IN RE: THE REQUEST OF GOVERNOR DENNIS DAUGAARD FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION IN THE MATTER OF THE INTERPRETATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE V, §§ 2 and 6 * * * * ORIGINAL PROCEEDING * * * * REQUEST RECEIVED JULY 13, 2011 OPINION FILED 07/26/11 #26089 ADVISORY OPINION TO HIS EXCELLENCY, DENNIS DAUGAARD, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. [¶1.] Pursuant to South Dakota Constitution article V, § 5 you have requested an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court on two important questions of law dealing with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Firefighters, Local 814South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Opinion of the Supreme Court Relative to the Constitutionality of Chapter 239, Session Laws of 1977South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API