Legal Opinion

Allen v. Department of the Air Force

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1988No. CIV-87-1545-TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RALPH G. THOMPSON, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative for Summary Judgment. The plaintiff has responded. Furthermore, at the Court’s request, the parties have filed supplemental briefs.

Plaintiff brings this claim under Executive Order 5396 and the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596. The Complaint alleges that the plaintiff was wrongfully terminated for service-connected disabilities. In particular, plaintiff states that the termination was due to excessive absences but that the majority of these absences were for medical appointments related…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Wimbley v. BolgerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
  3. Horace Ray Jackson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. United States Department Of Justice v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. Conrad v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Mitchell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API