Legal Opinion

Chattanooga v. Norman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. John A. Moon?> J.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

An ordinance of' the city of Chattanooga provides that:

“It is unlawful, and is hereby declared to be a nuisance, for. any animal of the horse, mule, cattle, sheep, swine, or goat kind to be found running at large on the open lots, streets, alleys, lanes, or commons within the corporation, except the territory south of Montgomery Avenue, east of the *74East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railroad track, and west of Cameron Hill.”

Other ordinances, not necessary to quote, make it the duty of the pound-keeper to impound animals found running at large within this limit, and hold them until reclaimed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Commonwealth v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. City of ParisTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Miller v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Pettit v. White CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API