Legal Opinion
Chattanooga v. Norman
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 11, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
FROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. John A. Moon?> J.
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
An ordinance of' the city of Chattanooga provides that:
“It is unlawful, and is hereby declared to be a nuisance, for. any animal of the horse, mule, cattle, sheep, swine, or goat kind to be found running at large on the open lots, streets, alleys, lanes, or commons within the corporation, except the territory south of Montgomery Avenue, east of the *74East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railroad track, and west of Cameron Hill.”
Other ordinances, not necessary to quote, make it the duty of the pound-keeper to impound animals found running at large within this limit, and hold them until reclaimed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Commonwealth v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. City of ParisTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Miller v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Pettit v. White CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1925