Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1944PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The complainant Lee Miller filed his original bill under the declaratory judgment statute, in which he alleged that a certain ordinance of the City of Memphis is invalid, the same requiring a permit for the operation of music boxes, commonly spoken of as “juke” boxes. The complainant alleges that he leases these music machines to various persons in the City of Memphis and elsewhere and that they are operated by an electric current; that they play selections of music automatically upon the insertion of a coin placed in a slot by customers; that he has paid State, County, City, and Federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chattanooga v. NormanTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Craig v. Mayor and AldermenTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lamere v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Boozer v. JohnsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  5. Jones v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API