State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
The state challenges a pretrial order suppressing evidence of driving after revocation and failure to provide proof of insurance. The state argues that the district court erred in ruling that the applicable traffic code provision prohibits lane changes without signaling only on high ways, not on city streets, and therefore the police did not have a lawful basis to stop respondent’s vehicle. Because we find that the applicable statute requires a motorist to signal lane changes on city streets, we reverse.
FACTS
Under Minnesota law,
[n]o person shall turn a vehicle at an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. RobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. BissonetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EakinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue ThorneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Johannes MarliemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015