Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 2002No. C4-02-561PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

The state challenges a pretrial order suppressing evidence of driving after revocation and failure to provide proof of insurance. The state argues that the district court erred in ruling that the applicable traffic code provision prohibits lane changes without signaling only on high ways, not on city streets, and therefore the police did not have a lawful basis to stop respondent’s vehicle. Because we find that the applicable statute requires a motorist to signal lane changes on city streets, we reverse.

FACTS

Under Minnesota law,

[n]o person shall turn a vehicle at an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. RobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. BissonetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EakinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue ThorneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Johannes MarliemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API