Sadler Machinery Co. v. Ohio National, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By KLOEB, District Judge.
This is an action by the plaintiff, a machinery dealer of Detroit, Michigan, against the defendant, a manufacturer at Upper Sandusky, Ohio, to recover the purchase price which plaintiff paid defendant for a 16" 6 spindle Bullard MultAu-Matic machine located at the plant of defendant at Upper Sandusky, which was severely damage^ by fire while in the plant. The claim of the plaintiff is based on the allegation that the machine was purchased F. O. B. cars Upper San-dusky, Ohio; that at the time of the fire- it was in the possession of defendant and had not been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leonard v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Briggs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Olsen v. McMaken & PentzienNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Schenning v. Devere & Schloegel Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Daniel Gage, Inc. v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Delta Tank Manufacturing Co. v. Weatherhead Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
- Sadler MacHinery Co. v. Ohio Nat., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Elias Sayour & Co. v. J. P. Stevens & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Multilink Incorporated v. Conway CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024