Legal Opinion

Daniel Gage, Inc. v. Kimball

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract in two counts to recover the price of ice, “sold and delivered” to the defendant under a sealed agreement which reads: “Agreement made this twentieth day of March, 1930 between • Daniel Gage, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation having *415a usual place of business in Lowell, Massachusetts, and George Kimball of Malden, Massachusetts. The said corporation agrees to sell and the said Kimball agrees to buy all the ice now in the houses of said corporation at North Littleton, Massachusetts, payments to be made weekly by the buyer at the rate of seventy-five cents (75c) per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Machine & Tool Co. v. Standard Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Farnum v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manhattan Clothing Co. v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Sadler Machinery Co. v. Ohio National, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
  3. B. H. Spinney Co. v. Western Massachusetts Finance Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API