Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Kent Nursery, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 13, 2011No. 41105-9-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 Kent Nursery Inc.; Steven, “Jane Doe,” Richard, and Phyllis Mauritsen; Fir Run Nursery LLC; Stanley Michael and Gayla Fenimore; 1 and Pierce County Public Works and Utilities appeal from the trial court’s orders (1) granting plaintiffs Tom and Kathleen McCoy a new trial, following a 16 day jury trial that resulted in a unanimous defense verdict and (2) denying the Nurseries’ and Pierce County’s motion for reconsideration. The Nurseries and Pierce County argue that the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered a new trial based on juror misconduct, and the Nurseries argue…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Tiger Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Long v. Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1384 v. Kitsap TransitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1384, V Kitsap TransitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Brian Hollins v. Richard Zbaraschuk And Alexia ZbaraschukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API