Legal Opinion
In Re Edmondson
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 5, 2007No. 19-10189PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MARK B. McFEELEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
The limited issue before the Court is how “projected disposable income” for purposes of confirming a chapter 13 plan is to be calculated for above-median income debtors under the provisions enacted by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPC-PA”). At the final hearing on confirmation, the Court requested that the parties submit briefs on the issue of whether projected disposable income is determined based solely on the Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re NanceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re BriscoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- In Re BarfknechtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re MeekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2007
- In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.