Legal Opinion

Sandra Sanders v. David W. Lanier and State of Tennessee - Concurring

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1998No. 02S01-9706-CH-00060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLDER, Justice.

The issue with which we are confronted is whether the State may be liable to a county employee for employment discrimination under the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”) when the county employee is under the supervision of a state judge who commits quid pro quo sexual harassment against the county employee. The trial court answered the question in the negative holding that the State was not the plaintiffs employer under the THRA. The Court of Appeals reversed and held that the THRA imposed liability on the State under an economic realities test. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lucille R. Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., Autolite DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Debi Eyerman v. Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. Carr v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kimberly B. Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington v. Robertson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Adair v. HunterDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
  3. Deborah H. Steele v. Superior Home Health Care of Chattanooga, Inc., and David Twombley - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API