Legal Opinion

McKenna v. ZO Skin Health, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 8, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00783Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VICKI McKENNA, ) ) CASE NO. 4:20CV0783 Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON v. ) ) ZO SKIN HEALTH, INC., et al., ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendants. ) [Resolving ECF No. 39] Pending is Defendant Triton Benefits & HR Solutions’ (“Triton”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 39) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The Court has been advised, having reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law. For the reasons below, the motion is granted. I. Background Plaintiff Vicki McKenna…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API