Legal Opinion
People v. Stansbury
California Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1995No. S004697. Crim. No. 24685PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
In People v. Stansbury (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1017 [17 Cal.Rptr.2d 174, 846 P.2d 756], we affirmed the judgment of death entered against defendant Stansbury for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 10-year-old child. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari limited to defendant’s claim of error under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974] (hereafter Miranda), and reversed. (Stansbury v. California (1994) 511 U.S__[128 L.Ed.2d 293, 114 S.Ct. 1526].)
The high court observed that language in our opinion referring to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.