Chu v. Mississippi State University
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
*768 MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN H. DAVIDSON, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss [44] all claims except the Title VII claim, and Plaintiffs motion to compel immunity-related discovery [58]. Upon due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss [44] should be granted and the motion to compel [58] should be denied as moot.
A Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff Dr. Yul Chu (“Plaintiff’) was a non-tenured professor at Mississippi State University (“MSU”) for several years until he was denied tenure and terminated from his…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roquette America, Inc. v. GerberCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
- Seals v. MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014
- Brownlee v. The Mississippi Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Demario Sumlar v. Prentiss County, Mississippi, et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026
- Hanes v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.