Stelzer v. LaRose
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— Dennis Uhl, as receiver of the “ People’s Bank,” sued the appellants upon the promissory note of the appellant Adams, made to Uhl as such receiver, alleging that the note was given for a part of the price of real estate sold and conveyed by the receiver to the said Adams, and praying a decree for the enforcement of a vendor’s lien. The appellant Catharine was made a party only because she was the wife of her co-appellant, and need not be further noticed; and any mention of the appellant or the defendant hereinafter made will be understood to refer to the appellant Adams.
The complaint was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Douglass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Adams v. La RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quill v. GallivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Evans v. FeenyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882