Legal Opinion

Stelzer v. LaRose

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Cass Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Dennis Uhl, as receiver of the “ People’s Bank,” sued the appellants upon the promissory note of the appellant Adams, made to Uhl as such receiver, alleging that the note was given for a part of the price of real estate sold and conveyed by the receiver to the said Adams, and praying a decree for the enforcement of a vendor’s lien. The appellant Catharine was made a party only because she was the wife of her co-appellant, and need not be further noticed; and any mention of the appellant or the defendant hereinafter made will be understood to refer to the appellant Adams.

The complaint was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Douglass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Adams v. La RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quill v. GallivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Evans v. FeenyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API