Legal Opinion

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 2004No. MDL 1261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the court is Defendants’ Motion Under Rule 60 to Correct Mistake (Docket No. 392, filed June 6, 2004), Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery (Docket No. 391, filed June 9, 2004), Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery (Docket No. 410, filed July 9, 2004), Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery (Docket No. 456, filed July 28, 2004), Memorandum by Class Counsel in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Relief Under F.R.C.P. 60(b)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mary Hopper v. Euclid Manor Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Meral Smith v. Melvin H. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API