Legal Opinion
L.W. Laird v. Integrated Resources, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1990No. 89-2201PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
I. THE FACTS
Laird, Underwood, and Hannington, the plaintiffs in this suit, (the “plaintiffs”) are employees of the LEM Construction Company Inc. (“LEM”). They also serve as trustees for the benefit of the LEM Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (“Trust”). LEM established the trust to benefit its approximately 200 employees.
The plaintiffs wanted professional assistance in managing the Trust. Consequently, they interviewed Jack Sorcic, one of the defendants, and hired him for $125 per hour. Sorcic is the president of Planning Ahead, a registered investment adviser, also a…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Louis S. Caiola v. Citibank, N.A., New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Edward Bontkowski v. Brian SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Universal Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.