Legal Opinion
Louis S. Caiola v. Citibank, N.A., New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 27, 2002No. Docket 01-7545PublishedCited by 185 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B.D. PARKER Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Louis . S. Caiola brought federal securities fraud and state law claims against defendant-appellee Citibank, N.A., New York arising from extensive physical and synthetic investments. The District Court (Denise L. Cote, Judge) granted Citibank’s motion to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), finding that Caio-la lacked standing under Rule 10b-5 to allege a violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) because he was not a purchaser or seller of securities, his synthetic…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc., Previously Known as Net Value Holdings, Inc., Andrew Panzo and Lee HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.