Legal Opinion
MORRYDE INTERNATIONAL INC v. AIRXCEL INC
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 11, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00271Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MORRYDE INTERNATIONAL INC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:25-CV-271-CCB-JEM AIRXCEL INC, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff MORryde’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF 36). In this motion, MORryde asks the Court to preliminarily enjoin Defendant Airxcel from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the allegedly infringing staircase products until this matter is resolved on the merits. Airxcel opposes MORryde’s request. (ECF 51). MORryde’s motion is denied for the following reasons. I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.