Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Francis McLaughlin United States of America v. Michael Lawrence Miller, United States of America v. Michael William Coyne

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1975No. 75--1179PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, * District Judge. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Stephen McLaughlin, Michael Miller and Michael Coyne were found guilty of possession with intent to distribute 378 pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). The defendants waived a trial by jury and submitted the matter upon signed stipulation to the district court judge. They allege in this appeal that the lower court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence and their motion to reveal the identity of the informant. -

We affirm the actions of the lower court.

On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. Saundra PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Anthony E. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Louis J. Cella, Jr., Stephen R. Evans, Theodore Schiffman, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Raymond Edwards, United States of America v. David RichardsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API