Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony E. Bradshaw

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1996No. 94-6487PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSEN, District Judge.

In this case we decide whether Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence that was obtained after he was stopped for driving with an altered temporary vehicle license tag should have been granted. The District Court denied the motion, and we now AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Dining a routine traffic patrol on October 19, 1991, Memphis police officer Martin Kula (“Officer Kula”) came up behind Defendants Appellant Anthony E. Bradshaw’s (“Appellant’s”) vehicle, while both vehicles were travelling in the same direction on a street in Memphis. Subsequently, Officer Kula stopped…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Kevin Davis (03-1451) and Keith Presley (03-1621)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API