Mersman v. O'Neil
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
Plaintiff recovered a jury verdict for $15,000 in damages in a malicious prosecution action against the defendants, Howard O’Neil, and Cox Standard Service, Inc. The award was for $5,000 actual damages and an additional $5,000 in punitive damages against each defendant. Defendants appeal, contending plaintiff did not make a submissible case against defendants on the issue of defendants having caused the plaintiffs arrest and prosecution. Defendants also complain the bracketed portion of the phrase, “occurrence [of the judicial proceedings] mentioned in evidence,” constituted an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Peak Ex Rel. Peak v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Ritter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lipari v. Volume Shoe Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gormly v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grady v. American Optical Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- City of St. Louis v. MilentzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994