Legal Opinion
City of St. Louis v. Milentz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1994No. 65375PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
The City of St. Louis (City) and the Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis (Retirement System) appeal dismissal of their petition seeking a declaratory judgment finding § 87.170(2) RSMo 1986 and § 4.18.125(B) of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis valid and enforceable. The City and Retirement System allege the statute and city ordinance authorize the mandatory retirement of George Horne (Home), the Chief Deputy Fire Marshall for the City of St. Louis. The trial court dismissed the petition because it found other adequate remedies existed and the issuance of declaratory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Cooper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- J.H. Fichman Co. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Rope v. BorronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mersman v. O'NeilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northgate Apartments v. City of North Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Grewell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Kinder v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jonalstem, Ltd. v. Corpus Christi National Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.