Shideler v. Naughton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Wm, Hutchinson, Judge. Action to enjoin the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors upon premises used and occupied by the defendant Naughton. Petition dismissed, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The evidence shows without material controversy that the place in question was being occupied by Naughton as a combination residence, barber shop and pool hall. It was also furnished with counter, drinking glasses and ice box. He sold drinks which are spoken of as “soft,” by which we may assume is meant nonintoxieating beverages. It had the reputation in the neighborhood of being a “blind pig,” or place where intoxicating liquors were clandestinely sold. A raid was made upon the premises by the officers of the law, who found some “fifteen or sixteen bottles of beer in the ice box” and other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- State v. SeversonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- State v. Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. FarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Sexton v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Nies v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- State v. HildSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.