State v. Intoxicating Liquors
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Worth District Court. — Hon. 0. H. Kelly, Judge. PROCEEDING against certain intoxicating liquor. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict to the effect that the liquor was owned or kept for the purpose of1 being sold in violation of law, and should be destroyed. Judgment was rendered, for the destruction of the liquor and against Anton Gordon, in whose possession it was -found, for costs. He appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtKobiNSON, C. J.
In December, 1897, A. A. Lnce filed in justice’s court an affidavit for a search warrant, in which he alleged that he had reason to believe, and did believe, that certain intoxicating liquors were being kept by Gordon & Hanson and Anton Gordon, in premises described, to be sold contrary to law. A search warrant Avas issued and served, and a return was made thereon, which showed that two bottles containing alcohol wore found in the premises described, and that the bottles were in the possession of the officer, subject to the order of the court. Anton Gordon appeared in justice’s court, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex parte WoodwardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Nies v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Shideler v. NaughtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Butterfield v. Consolidated Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.