Legal Opinion
Alanson Saltmarsh v. James W. Tuthill
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 27, 1852PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 U.S. 387
12 How. 387
13 L.Ed. 1034
ALANSON SALTMARSH
v.
JAMES W. TUTHILL.
December Term, 1851
A MOTION was made for a mandamus in this case, to compel the district judge to set aside an order of supersedeas and to order the clerk to issue an execution.
The circumstances were these:——
At the fall term, 1849, of the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Alabama, Tuthill obtained a judgment against Saltmarsh in a common-law case.
Saltmarsh took an appeal in open court, and at the same time executed an appeal-bond, in a penalty of double the amount of the judgment.
After the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Brown v. EvansUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
- Odbert v. MarquetCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- Universal Service Wireless, Inc. v. Federal Radio CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
- Jabine v. OatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.