Bisceglia Motor Sales, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
September 28, 1957, plaintiff commenced suit, in the United States district court for the western district of Michigan, against above defendant Studebaker-Packard. The complaint alleges generally that the named defendant is accountable to the plaintiff, in damages, for wrongful termination of a dealer sales agreement made between the plaintiff dealer and the defendant manufacturer of motor vehicles. The first count charges an actionable violation by defendant Studebaker-Packard of the so-called automobile dealer’s franchise act (15 USC [1958 ed], § 1221 et seq). The second count charges…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Chapple v. National Hardwood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- John J. Gamalski Hardware, Inc. v. Wayne County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Pinel v. CampsellMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Meldman Cartage Co. v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Darin v. HavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Valeo Switches & Detection Systems, Inc. v. EMCom, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bisceglia Motor Sales, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Rowry v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.