Legal Opinion

Hogeboom v. Milliman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

II. H. Hogeboom and E. T. Hogeboom are respectively father and son. On January 6, 1922, E. T. Hogeboom and wife made to H. H. Hogeboom a warranty deed for the town property in controversy herein. This deed was not recorded until October 20, 1922. E. T. Hogeboom, at the time in controversy herein, was indebted to the Pisgah Sayings Bank, and had some other indebtedness. He was the owner, at the time, of 160 acres of land, on which Annis & Eohling held .a first mortgage of $10,000, and the Pisgah .Savings Bank a-third mortgage. The Annis & Eohling mortgage was foreclosed, and the property sold,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Richards v. Schreiber, Conchar & Westphal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Barks v. KleyneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Steinfort v. LanghoutSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pike v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Knabe v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Dimick v. MunsingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Oelke v. HoweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API