Legal Opinion

Steinfort v. Langhout

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 17, 1915PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. AYm. D. Boies, Judge. Action to set aside a sale of personal property on the grounds that it was made for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding creditors. Decree for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

This action is brought in equity to set aside a certain bill of sale executed by the defendant, Samuel Langhout, to Henry Langhout on the 3d day of October, 1912.

1. Fraudulentconveyances: creditor taking conveyanee: good minded. Samuel Langhout is a son of Henry Langhout, and, at the time of the making of the bill of sale, resided on a farm owned by his father, Henry. The property covered by the bill of sale was, at the time of its execution, in the possession of Samuel Langhout, and . consisted of horses, colts, cows, calves, shoats, chickens, farm machinery, buggies and wagons, three sets…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richards v. Schreiber, Conchar & Westphal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Jones v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Clark v. RaymondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Headington v. LanglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barks v. KleyneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Carlisle v. MillimanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Grant v. CherrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. First National Bank v. MensingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API