Legal Opinion

Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23J

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1991No. UP-42-89; CA A62432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Tigard Education Association (Union) 1 is the exclusive bargaining representative under the Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA), ORS 243.650 et seq, for teachers employed by Tigard School District 23J (District). During negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement, among Union’s proposals was one entitled “Workload,” which specified grade-by-grade class size limits. 2 District refused to bargain, contending that class size is not a mandatory subject of bargaining. Union filed a charge with the Employment Relations Board (ERB), alleging that District’s refusal to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Portland Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Portland Firefighters Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23JOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State of Corrections DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23JOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23JOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API