Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23J

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1992No. ERB UP-42-89; CA A62432; SC S38109Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

This case is about workload. Workload has been treated by the Employment Relations Board (ERB), the administrative agency that is responsible for the collective bargaining law, ORS 243.650 et seq, as being an “other condition * * * of employment,” which is a subject for mandatory bargaining.1 ERB held that Tigard Education Association’s (Teachers) proposal to limit the number of students in classrooms and the number of handicapped and exceptionally gifted students assigned to individual teachers is a “workload” issue and, derivatively, an “other condition * * * of employment” about which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Portland Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API