Legal Opinion

Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23J

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1992No. ERB UP-42-89; CA A62432; SC S38109Published

1Opinion of the Court

840 P.2d 657 (1992)

314 Or. 274

TUALATIN VALLEY BARGAINING COUNCIL, Respondent on Review,

v.

TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J, Petitioner on Review.

ERB UP-42-89; CA A62432; SC S38109.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted November 4, 1991.

Decided September 24, 1992.

William H. Walters, of Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Paul B. Gamson, of Bennett & Durham, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

William G. Paulus, of Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson, Paulus, Jennings & Comstock, P.C., Salem,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. West Irondequoit Teachers Ass'n v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Boston Teachers Union v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. City of Biddeford Ex Rel. Board of Education v. Biddeford Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API