Legal Opinion

Larry Binkley, et al. v. Uponor, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 26, 2026No. 3:25-cv-07180Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LARRY BINKLEY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-07180-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 UPONOR, INC., Docket No. 72 11 Defendant. 12 13 This is a putative products liability class action by homeowners against Uponor, a pipe- 14 maker, alleging that Uponor makes defective pipes. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiffs’ 15 FAL, CLRA, UCL, and fraud by concealment claims for lack of reliance, with leave to amend. 16 Dkt. No. 62. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, again alleging claims under the UCL,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API