Legal Opinion

Star-Batt, Inc v. City of Rochester Hills

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2002No. Docket 225508PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Plaintiff Star-Batt, Inc., formerly known as Stolaruk Corporation, appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant city of Rochester Hills’ 1 motion for summary disposition. We reverse and remand.

I. nature of the case

A city of Rochester Hills ordinance requires contractors, such as plaintiff, to post a cash bond as a fund of dollars available to compensate the city if the contractor causes damage to city property or fails to pay for certain city services. The city ordinance is silent regarding the ownership or ultimate disposition of any interest earned on the fund. Similarly,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gora v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Energetics, Ltd v. WhitmillMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HRSS, INC. v. Wayne County TreasurerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  2. Brigitte Hendershot v. Terry StantonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. Jessica Marino, et al. v. Comerica Bank, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Mary Pustelak, et al. v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API